THE INSIGHT EXPRESS

Newspapers

The day's papers, read for the exam. Every article here is rewritten and reviewed — we link you to the original, we never reprint it.

Read the week in one go

PaperGS-1 GS-2 GS-3 GS-4

SourceThe Hindu Business Line The Indian Express

Recent

Wed12 Thu13 Fri14 Sat15 Sun16 Mon17 Tue18

15 August 2026

Read these

1 article

The HinduGS-1GS-2GS-418min
India at 80: a democracy in search of renewal
Ashwani Kumar
Ashwani Kumar is a senior lawyer at the Supreme Court and was once the Law Minister of India. He has written this piece as India enters its 80th year of freedom. His main point is simple. India has done well in many areas — the economy is strong, science and defence have grown, the country now has a big role in world affairs. But when we look at the quality of our democracy, the picture is mixed. He lists his worries. Centre and States are fighting more than they should. Members of Parliament change parties for personal gain. The Election Commission's fairness is being doubted. The Supreme Court has been slow in giving bail and slow in deciding cases. The way judges are picked — the collegium system — is being questioned. And the media, which should watch power, is now often serving power. He ends by saying the fix is not just political. It has to start with ordinary citizens waking up. He points to the recent student protests at Jantar Mantar as a sign of hope — young people still care about justice. The outer machine of democracy is working — elections happen, courts open, Parliament meets. The audit here is of the inner layer: what those institutions are actually delivering for an ordinary Indian.
- 8Key Ideas
- Ammunition
- 5Prelims Drill
- Mains Practice

14 August 2026

Read these

1 article

The Indian ExpressGS-2GS-428min
Parliament's productivity — the cost of disruption and the case for a performance compact
Gourav Vallabh
The Monsoon Session of 2026 has ended, and the author uses PRS Legislative Research data to argue that Parliament failed the productivity test — Lok Sabha worked only 15% of scheduled time (17.5 hours out of roughly 114 scheduled) and Rajya Sabha 33% (37.37 hours). Applying the widely cited Rs 2.5 lakh per minute benchmark — split as Rs 1.25 lakh per House-minute, from 2008 and 2012 assessments — the author estimates the opportunity cost at about Rs 130 crore for the session. The piece then contrasts this with the 2026 Budget Session, which ran at 86% and 92% productivity, showing that the same institution works when political actors choose deliberation over spectacle. It uses the August 12 episode — where Home Minister Amit Shah offered an extended debate and the Opposition refused — to argue that demanding accountability and then refusing the forum is a contradiction. It closes with a four-point reform proposal, a "Parliamentary Performance Compact" , covering make-up time for lost hours, guaranteed debate routes, a real-time public dashboard, and stricter daily-allowance accountability. Four months apart, the same members under the same rules produced 15% and then 86%. The machinery is not broken — the failure is behavioural, and that is what makes it fixable. This is an opinion piece by Prof. Gourav Vallabh, a part-time member of the Prime Minister's Economic Advisory Council, and it carries a viewpoint. The concepts below are set out neutrally, and the counter-view has a block of its own on the Ammunition tab.
- 7Key Ideas
- Ammunition
- 5Prelims Drill
- Mains Practice

11 August 2026

Read these

1 article

The HinduGS-1GS-2GS-49min
How personality cults derail democracy
Nirupama Rao
In 1937 an essay appeared in The Modern Review titled 'The Rashtrapati'. It was signed, cryptically, "Chanakya". Readers at the time did not know who had written it. It was Jawaharlal Nehru. He was at the height of his popularity, and he was writing anonymously about the danger that his own popularity posed to India. "Therein lies danger for Jawaharlal and for India," he wrote. The country might prosper a little under a benevolent despotism, but she would remain stunted. Twelve years later, addressing the Constituent Assembly on 25 November 1949, B.R. Ambedkar said the same thing far more bluntly. "Bhakti in religion may be a road to the salvation of the soul. But in politics, Bhakti or hero-worship is a sure road to degradation and to eventual dictatorship." Now here is the writer's point. Neither warning is aimed at rulers, she argues. Both are aimed at citizens. Because the danger rarely arrives from above, as a leader seizing power. It rises from below — from ordinary people willing to hand over the burdens of citizenship to someone who looks larger than life. And look again at the word Nehru chose. Not "despotism". "Stunted". His fear was not that India would become a dictatorship. It was that India would stop growing, because a people used to looking for a saviour loses the habits a republic runs on — doubt, argument, participation, responsibility.
- 5Key Ideas
- Ammunition
- 2Prelims Drill
- Mains Practice