Newspapers
The day's papers, read for the exam. Every article here is rewritten and reviewed — we link you to the original, we never reprint it.
Read the week in one go13 August 2026
The Hindu (5)
★ Highlights (2)
5 articles in all · 17 min to read everything
Worth knowing
3 articlesshorter — summary and concepts- 1min
Faith healing poses challenge to authorities as diseases kill 7 tribal children in Madhya Pradesh
This news from Balaghat is a stark reminder of the health and nutritional vulnerability that tribal communities in India continue to face. Seven Baiga children have died and nearly 100 have fallen ill due to monsoon-related diseases — malaria, typhoid, viral and skin infections — across five remote villages. The administration got to know only after three deaths had already occurred, and two structural gaps stand out: the villages sit about 85 km from the district hospital, and the community's reliance on faith healing over modern medicine delayed early intervention. The Baiga are classified as a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG) — the "sabse kamzor" category within Scheduled Tribes, identified on parameters like pre-agricultural livelihood, stagnant or declining population, low literacy, and subsistence economy. Cases like this show why the PVTG classification exists in the first place, and why last-mile health delivery, immunisation coverage, and community trust-building need to run parallel to physical infrastructure. To understand the deeper structural angle, please read: 📖 Theme 8: Health + Nutrition Vulnerability → https://www.theinsightexpress.com/article/29ddcfe2-9c21-491d-9e5d-363f446b22c1 📖 PVTG framework — Section 4: "Sabse Kamzor" Tribes ki Identification → https://www.theinsightexpress.com/article/5a39850b-b43a-4562-a419-2930cd083396 Together, these two pieces give the full backdrop — why such incidents keep recurring, and what the PVTG label is supposed to safeguard against.
Source: The Hindu | Reported by Mehul Malpani, BhopalThe Hindu - 6min
Amid tussle, NCSC panel to probe Centre’s de-reservation proposals
The National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has decided to comprehensively review all de-reservation proposals sent by the Central government in the last three years. De-reservation means filling up a reserved vacancy as an unreserved (general) one — allowed only in exceptional cases like a Group 'A' vacancy that cannot remain unfilled "in public interest." The NCSC has been repeatedly clashing with the Centre because most proposals come without showing what alternate efforts were made to fill the post with SC candidates. In its recent meetings, the Commission has rejected such proposals from Ministries like Law, Housing, MeitY, NCB, CRPF and various PSUs, and has now suggested exploring deputation or short-term contracts before resorting to de-reservation.
Source: The Hindu | Reported by Abhinay Lakshman, New DelhiThe Hindu - 2min
A timely reset for the Food Security Act
It is around the draft National Food Security (Amendment) Bill, 2026 , specifically the proposal to change how Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) entitlements are calculated. The core issue in simple terms: Right now, PDS has two categories: Priority Households (PHH) — get 5 kg foodgrain per person per month AAY households (the poorest of the poor) — get a flat 35 kg per household , regardless of family size The flat 35 kg works well for small families (a widow living alone gets 35 kg — very generous). But for a 7-member family, it drops to 5 kg per person, and for 8 members, only 4.4 kg per person — which is actually less than the PHH entitlement. So there's an inequity. The draft amendment proposes : 7 kg per person, capped at 35 kg. The problem the authors flag: This "fixes" large households only on paper (no one gets more than 35 kg), but it reduces entitlement for small AAY households by 20–80%. Tamil Nadu's example — 84.5% of its AAY households have fewer than 5 members, so allocation would drop by ~35.6%. Authors' three-part recommendation: No-loss safeguard — preserve the existing 35 kg for every AAY household Review the 35 kg ceiling separately for larger/high-dependency households using consumption + nutrition + fiscal evidence Separately finance dietary diversification (pulses, millets, oils, eggs, milk) — don't fund it by cutting cereal entitlement They also push a bigger reframe: move from food security (calories/grain) → nutrition security (balanced diet) , because India now faces a double burden of malnutrition — stunting/wasting coexists with diabetes/prediabetes (101 mn + 136 mn Indians).
The Hindu