Newspapers
The day's papers, read for the exam. Every article here is rewritten and reviewed — we link you to the original, we never reprint it.
Read the week in one go11 August 2026
The Hindu (7)
7 articles in all · 46 min to read everything
Read these
3 articles- The HinduGS-1GS-310min
Why does handloom remain a key part of India's economy?
Priyambada Jayakumar
More than 35 lakh weavers and allied workers sit at India's handlooms, spread across over 31 lakh households. Nearly 70% of them are women. Between them they make about 15% of the country's cloth, almost entirely by hand. That is not a craft. That is an industry, and it is one of rural India's largest sources of work outside farming. Now here is the writer's point. Handloom is usually filed under culture — valuable, admired, economically small. She argues that reading is simply wrong, and the number that settles it is the capital. Handloom does all of the above on very little investment. Few manufacturing sectors create as many jobs for so small a sum. And India's central economic problem is exactly that — manufacturing that does not create enough jobs per rupee put in. The trouble is not with the famous weaves. Those still sell. It is the hundreds of lesser-known traditions that are dying, as returns fall, markets stay scattered, and families stop teaching the skill to their children. Her answer has two halves. Stop selling handloom because it is old and start selling it as premium — craftsmanship, sustainability, exclusivity — with limited production treated as a feature rather than a weakness. The second half is duller and probably matters more. Nobody counts this sector. There is no reliable figure for what it contributes to GDP, exports, taxes or household income. A sector that is not counted cannot be planned for, and will keep being treated as small.
- 6Key Ideas
- Ammunition
- 2Prelims Drill
- Mains Practice
- The HinduGS-1GS-2GS-310min
Agasthyamalai eviction orders still silence Forest Rights Act
C.R. Bijoy
Thousands of families in the Agasthyamalai hills of Tamil Nadu have been given eviction notices. The Forest Department says they are sitting on forest land illegally. The order came from the Supreme Court. Before that, a committee surveyed the whole area and reported what it found. Now here is the writer's point. He is not saying evictions are unfair. He is saying something sharper — the law already tells us who is an illegal occupier, and nobody has bothered to apply it. The Forest Rights Act says this. If you were living on forest land before 13 December 2005, you have a right there. Nobody can evict you until your claim is checked and decided. Only if your claim fails that check are you an encroacher. That check has not been done. And no government has ever published how many people fall outside the Act. So every "encroacher" number in this case is a number nobody can verify.
- 6Key Ideas
- Ammunition
- 2Prelims Drill
- Mains Practice
- The HinduGS-1GS-2GS-49min
How personality cults derail democracy
Nirupama Rao
In 1937 an essay appeared in The Modern Review titled 'The Rashtrapati'. It was signed, cryptically, "Chanakya". Readers at the time did not know who had written it. It was Jawaharlal Nehru. He was at the height of his popularity, and he was writing anonymously about the danger that his own popularity posed to India. "Therein lies danger for Jawaharlal and for India," he wrote. The country might prosper a little under a benevolent despotism, but she would remain stunted. Twelve years later, addressing the Constituent Assembly on 25 November 1949, B.R. Ambedkar said the same thing far more bluntly. "Bhakti in religion may be a road to the salvation of the soul. But in politics, Bhakti or hero-worship is a sure road to degradation and to eventual dictatorship." Now here is the writer's point. Neither warning is aimed at rulers, she argues. Both are aimed at citizens. Because the danger rarely arrives from above, as a leader seizing power. It rises from below — from ordinary people willing to hand over the burdens of citizenship to someone who looks larger than life. And look again at the word Nehru chose. Not "despotism". "Stunted". His fear was not that India would become a dictatorship. It was that India would stop growing, because a people used to looking for a saviour loses the habits a republic runs on — doubt, argument, participation, responsibility.
- 5Key Ideas
- Ammunition
- 2Prelims Drill
- Mains Practice
Worth knowing
4 articlesshorter — summary and concepts- 4min
State song must be sung first, says T.N. Assembly resolution
Tamil Nadu now requires its State song to be sung before any programme begins — in schools and universities, in government offices, in public sector undertakings, at public institutions of every kind. The Assembly voted for it on Monday, and every party voted yes. The song is Tamil Thai Vazhthu, taken from Manonmaniam, written by Manonmaniam Sundaranar in 1891. Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay moved the resolution, later called it historic, and thanked all parties for supporting it. It has in fact been sung first at government functions for a long time. A government order to that effect came into force on 23 November 1970, and the previous DMK government recognised it as the State song by an order of 12 December 2021. Now here is why this matters. The DMK voted for the resolution and then asked for something more — a special law to give it legal status. That single demand tells you what Monday's vote is worth. A resolution is the House saying what it thinks. It carries weight, and a government usually follows it, but nobody can be taken to court for ignoring it. A law is different: it creates a duty, names who must do what, and provides a consequence when they do not. Ask what happens if somebody ignores it — that is the whole test, and it travels far beyond this story, because Parliament and every Assembly pass resolutions that never bind the way a statute does.
The HinduGS-1GS-2 - 4min
Meghalaya's district council approves amendments to bar non-tribals from poll process
In the Garo Hills of western Meghalaya, the district council has decided who is allowed to vote for it. From now on, only tribals. Non-tribals can neither vote in its elections nor contest them. The council will also stop borrowing the voters' list made for Assembly elections and prepare one of its own. Rules 128 and 129 were amended on Monday to do both things. The council's Chief Executive Member, M. Dhormonath Ch Sangma, called it a significant step in protecting the rights and interests of the tribal people of Garo Hills. This did not come out of nowhere. Earlier this year a notification tried to bar non-tribals from contesting. Violence followed in Garo Hills and two people died. The Meghalaya High Court cancelled that notification, and the election due on 10 April was postponed. Now here is why this matters. Most Sixth Schedule news is about places asking to be brought under it — Ladakh, parts of Manipur, parts of Jharkhand. This story is the other half. It shows what a council does once it already holds those powers. The first thing this one has done is decide its own electorate. And that runs straight into Article 325, which says nobody may be left out of an electoral roll only because of religion, race, caste or sex. Whether a Sixth Schedule council sits outside that sentence, because the Schedule gives it its own powers, is not settled. It is the question a court will be asked next.
The HinduGS-1GS-2 - 4min
PMLA case after conviction for predicate offence doesn't amount to second trial: HC
Eleven people were convicted for looting and cheating others of several lakhs of rupees in 2016, in the guise of exchanging demonetised notes. A trial court sentenced them to six years in 2024. Their appeals against that conviction are still pending before the Karnataka High Court. Then came a second case, this one under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. They went to the High Court and said it was the same crime being tried over again. Now here is why this matters. The Court said no, and the reason is worth holding. The first crime punishes the act itself — the cheating, the looting. Laundering punishes what was done with the money afterwards: hiding it, moving it, dressing it up as clean. Two different offences, even though the second could not exist without the first. The words the Court leaned on sit in Section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Code. It bars a second trial for the same offence. Not the same episode, not the same facts — the same offence. A prosecution for a distinct offence under another enactment falls outside that bar altogether. So the PMLA case goes ahead. The eleven must come out clean in a full trial before the special court, and Justice M. Nagaprasanna dismissed their petitions.
The HinduGS-2GS-3 - 5min
Tribunals Reforms Bill passed amid din in LS
The Lok Sabha passed a Bill on Monday to create a National Tribunals Commission. One body will now select the chairpersons and members of tribunals, and watch over how they work. It will sit in New Delhi — a chairperson and four members, two judicial and two technical. A retired Supreme Court judge, or a retired Chief Justice of a High Court, is eligible to head it. Once both Houses clear the Bill, the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 goes. This was not the government's idea. The Supreme Court struck down provisions of the 2021 Act, and then directed that exactly this be built — an independent commission, with professional expertise, transparent selection and an oversight mechanism for appointments. Now here is why this matters. The Bill was passed by voice vote. Nobody debated it. Not one speech. The Opposition was in the House, but protesting about something else — it wanted Union Home Minister Amit Shah to make a statement on the police crackdown on students during the 20 July protest in New Delhi against paper leaks. Members had given notices opposing this Bill's introduction. They chose not to speak amid the din. So a law written to protect judicial independence went through a House that did not examine it. The content answers the Court. The process raises the very question the Court was worried about — whether anybody is checking anybody.
The HinduGS-2